Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 20:43

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Obituary for Alan A Hines - holcombefuneralhomes.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What is it like to wear a kilt?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why is only the left side of my vagina bleeding, on and off?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why do some men like anal sex?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Since the Brits can't steer their oil tanker, what makes them think they can take on Russia?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Weird-shaped notebooks make me want to write again - The Verge